LCA critical review (ISO 14040 / ISO 14044) — independent technical assessment
We conduct independent Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) critical reviews in accordance with ISO 14040 and ISO 14044 to evaluate methodological conformity, modelling integrity, data representativeness, allocation logic, impact assessment application and reporting transparency. This engagement is built for studies intended for public disclosure, comparative assertions, EPD publication, regulatory submission or high-level stakeholder scrutiny.
DEISO performs this service as an independent technical assessor and does not participate in the preparation or modelling of the study under review. Our structured assessment identifies methodological deviations, boundary inconsistencies, unsupported assumptions and reporting vulnerabilities prior to formal declaration or verification.
By confirming ISO-aligned conformity and analytical defensibility, we reduce reputational risk, build stakeholder confidence and strengthen the credibility of your LCA deliverables within procurement, ESG disclosure and regulatory environments.
Independent ESG report review
We conduct independent, pre-submission technical reviews of ESG reports prior to public disclosure, investor engagement, regulatory filing or external assurance. This engagement evaluates the structural integrity, data consistency, boundary definition, materiality logic, governance alignment and methodological defensibility of your existing ESG documentation.
DEISO does not prepare ESG reports under this service. We strictly assess internally developed or consultant-prepared reports to identify unsupported claims, calculation inconsistencies, disclosure gaps, risk misalignment and governance weaknesses before third-party scrutiny.
Our structured review strengthens credibility, reduces reputational exposure, improves assurance readiness and builds investor confidence. By turning ESG reporting from narrative disclosure into defensible governance intelligence, we help organisations protect strategic positioning while improving transparency and accountability.
Product Carbon Footprint (PCF) review
We conduct independent technical and pre-submission review of Product Carbon Footprint (PCF) studies prior to external verification, customer submission, regulatory disclosure or supply chain reporting. This engagement evaluates system boundaries, allocation logic, functional unit definition, emission factor selection, data representativeness and methodological alignment with ISO 14067 and GHG Protocol Product Standard requirements.
DEISO does not develop the PCF model under this service. We assess internally prepared or consultant-developed product carbon studies to identify structural inconsistencies, unsupported assumptions, calculation errors and documentation gaps before third-party scrutiny.
Our structured review reduces verification risk, strengthens supply chain credibility and buyer confidence, and supports defensible product-level climate disclosures. We position your PCF deliverables as governance-aligned, verification-ready climate intelligence assets.
GHG emissions review (Scope 1–3)
We perform independent, pre-submission reviews of organisational greenhouse gas inventories covering Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 emissions. This engagement evaluates boundary definitions, activity data reliability, emission factor selection, calculation methodologies, consolidation approaches and documentation integrity in alignment with ISO 14064 and the GHG Protocol.
DEISO does not develop or calculate the emissions inventory under this service. We assess internally prepared or consultant-generated inventories to identify structural weaknesses, unsupported assumptions, data traceability gaps and methodological inconsistencies before third-party verification, regulatory submission or public disclosure.
Our structured review strengthens verification readiness, reduces assurance findings, builds investor confidence and improves climate governance defensibility. We turn carbon accounting from a reporting obligation into decision-grade climate intelligence.
EPD pre-submission review services
We conduct independent technical review of Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs) prior to submission to program operators or third-party verifiers. This engagement evaluates conformity with ISO 14025 requirements, applicable Product Category Rules (PCRs), underlying LCA methodological alignment, data consistency, impact calculation integrity and documentation completeness.
DEISO does not develop the EPD under this service. We assess internally prepared or consultant-developed EPD documentation to identify structural gaps, methodological inconsistencies, unsupported environmental claims and verification vulnerabilities before formal submission.
Our structured review strengthens approval readiness, reduces verification queries, protects market positioning and supports defensible environmental transparency. We position your EPD deliverables as credible, standards-aligned instruments suitable for green procurement, infrastructure tenders and international market access.
Scope 3 category-level pre-submission review | Categories 1–15
We conduct independent, category-level technical review of Scope 3 emissions inventories across Categories 1–15 to strengthen methodological defensibility prior to external verification, regulatory submission or supply chain disclosure. This engagement evaluates boundary definition, supplier data integrity, estimation methodologies, emission factor selection, spend-based versus activity-based approaches and calculation transparency in alignment with the GHG Protocol.
DEISO does not prepare or calculate Scope 3 emissions under this service. We assess internally developed or consultant-generated inventories to identify structural gaps, double-counting risk, category misclassification, unsupported assumptions and documentation weaknesses before third-party scrutiny.
Our structured review reduces assurance findings, strengthens buyer and investor confidence, and improves climate governance maturity. We turn complex Scope 3 inventories into defensible, review-ready climate intelligence aligned with enterprise risk management and decarbonisation strategy.
Sustainability data governance and internal control review
We conduct independent reviews of sustainability data governance frameworks and internal control systems supporting ESG reporting, GHG inventories, LCA studies and environmental disclosures. This engagement evaluates data ownership structures, control procedures, calculation workflows, documentation traceability, system integration logic and cross-functional accountability mechanisms.
DEISO does not implement internal control systems under this service. We assess existing governance architecture to identify control weaknesses, data integrity risks, segregation-of-duties gaps, audit trail deficiencies and structural misalignment between sustainability data and enterprise reporting systems.
Our structured review strengthens assurance readiness and investor confidence, reduces regulatory exposure, and embeds sustainability into enterprise-grade governance architecture. We turn sustainability data from operational output into controlled, traceable, board-level intelligence.